act which, if committed within the Colony, would be an indictable offence
You point out
that the proposed clause would permit of the Company's name being struck off the register for failure to satisfy the Inspector whether the act complained of, if committed elsewhere than in Hongkong, would be any indictable offence, & that it does not provide that any person connected with the Company shall be deemed to have committed the same offence in China in contemplation of the law there in force, before the Company is penalized in the Colony.
3. As regards this I am to observe that it concurred in Lord Elgin's opinion, giving rise to great practical inconvenience if the Colonial Government were required to satisfy itself, and also the Court to which the case might be referred, on points connected with the criminal law of foreign countries, and it appears to their Lordships that there is nothing unreasonable or inequitable in the Colonial Government's laying down the principle that it will not allow a Company
act which, if committed within the Colony, wooned In an indictable offence
You point out
thal
the
proposed chause
wine's pennit of the Company's
bing struck off the regis for
insepetin of
whether
act complained of. if committed deewhee
than in Stangkay.
weet
any
an indictable or Offence, & that it dow
not provide that any perso comected wilte
Uta
shamed h.
Company
of having
carricted
committed same office
•
in China in contemplation. of the law theme in force,
before the Company is
penalized in the Colony,
the
panil
3. As regards this
I am
& obe318
that it commed in Love Elgin's opinion, gin
rise to gonal practical inconvenience if the Colonial forument
mquired to satisfy itself
and also the Court to which I.
I. case comed
to referred, an points
comectad witte
criminal law of foreign
Countries
and it
appears this Lordshi that there is nothing
uurtasonable
(the
maquitable in Colonial forument's
laying down the
principle that it will
not all no a
Campany
-- .
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.